Continuous vertical inside-out versus traditional vertical inside-out meniscal repair: a biomechanical comparison
| dc.contributor.author | Faria, José Leonardo Rocha de | |
| dc.contributor.author | Santos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pavão, Douglas Mello | |
| dc.contributor.author | Radulski, Mariana | |
| dc.contributor.author | More, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mozella, Alan de Paula | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guimarães, João Antônio Matheus | |
| dc.contributor.author | LaPrade, Robert F | |
| dc.contributor.author | Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello | |
| dc.contributor.author | Salim, Rodrigo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-20T17:50:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. Purpose: To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loading, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 28 porcine knees were acquired and divided into 2 test groups of 14 medial meniscus each. A 2.0-cm longitudinal red-white zone cut was made in the body of the medial meniscus for each knee. The continuous suture (CS) group received 4 vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the inside-out suture (IO) group received a traditional vertical suture with 4 stitches. Two traction tapes were passed between the sutures and positioned in the biomechanical testing fixture device. Each specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 5 mm/s, and displacement, system stiffness, and maximum load to failure were compared between the groups. Results: The displacement after the cyclic test was 0.53 6 0.12 and 0.48 6 0.07 mm for the CS and IO groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .2792). The stiffness at the ultimate load testing was 36.3 6 1.9 and 35.3 6 2.4 N/mm for groups CS and IO, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .2557). In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate load was 218.2 6 63.9 and 238.3 6 71.3 N in the CS and IO groups, respectively, with no significant group differences (P = .3062). Conclusion: A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions that was beneficial and biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. Clinical Relevance: The study findings indicate that use of the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is a possible therapeutic option. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | FARIA, José Leonardo Rocha de; SANTOS, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi; PAVÃO, Douglas Mello; RADULSKI, Mariana; MORE, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo; MOZELLA, Alan de Paula; GUIMARÃES, João Antônio Matheus; LAPRADE, Robert F; ROESLER, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello; SALIM, Rodrigo. Continuous vertical inside-out versus traditional vertical inside-out meniscal repair: a biomechanical comparison. The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. [S. l.]. v.11. n. 11. p1-8. 2023. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/23259671231209951 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2325-9671 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ortobase.into.saude.gov.br/handle/123456789/484 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Biomechanics | |
| dc.subject | Inside-Out | |
| dc.subject | Meniscal Repair | |
| dc.subject | Primary Fixation | |
| dc.title | Continuous vertical inside-out versus traditional vertical inside-out meniscal repair: a biomechanical comparison | |
| dc.type | Article |