Continuous vertical inside-out versus traditional vertical inside-out meniscal repair: a biomechanical comparison

dc.contributor.authorFaria, José Leonardo Rocha de
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi
dc.contributor.authorPavão, Douglas Mello
dc.contributor.authorRadulski, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorMore, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo
dc.contributor.authorMozella, Alan de Paula
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, João Antônio Matheus
dc.contributor.authorLaPrade, Robert F
dc.contributor.authorRoesler, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello
dc.contributor.authorSalim, Rodrigo
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-20T17:50:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. Purpose: To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loading, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 28 porcine knees were acquired and divided into 2 test groups of 14 medial meniscus each. A 2.0-cm longitudinal red-white zone cut was made in the body of the medial meniscus for each knee. The continuous suture (CS) group received 4 vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the inside-out suture (IO) group received a traditional vertical suture with 4 stitches. Two traction tapes were passed between the sutures and positioned in the biomechanical testing fixture device. Each specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 5 mm/s, and displacement, system stiffness, and maximum load to failure were compared between the groups. Results: The displacement after the cyclic test was 0.53 6 0.12 and 0.48 6 0.07 mm for the CS and IO groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (P = .2792). The stiffness at the ultimate load testing was 36.3 6 1.9 and 35.3 6 2.4 N/mm for groups CS and IO, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P = .2557). In the load-to-failure test, the ultimate load was 218.2 6 63.9 and 238.3 6 71.3 N in the CS and IO groups, respectively, with no significant group differences (P = .3062). Conclusion: A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions that was beneficial and biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. Clinical Relevance: The study findings indicate that use of the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is a possible therapeutic option.
dc.identifier.citationFARIA, José Leonardo Rocha de; SANTOS, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi; PAVÃO, Douglas Mello; RADULSKI, Mariana; MORE, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo; MOZELLA, Alan de Paula; GUIMARÃES, João Antônio Matheus; LAPRADE, Robert F; ROESLER, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello; SALIM, Rodrigo. Continuous vertical inside-out versus traditional vertical inside-out meniscal repair: a biomechanical comparison. The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. [S. l.]. v.11. n. 11. p1-8. 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/23259671231209951
dc.identifier.issn2325-9671
dc.identifier.urihttps://ortobase.into.saude.gov.br/handle/123456789/484
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.subjectInside-Out
dc.subjectMeniscal Repair
dc.subjectPrimary Fixation
dc.titleContinuous vertical inside-out versus traditional vertical inside-out meniscal repair: a biomechanical comparison
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Faria, José Leonardo Rocha de et al_2023.pdf
Size:
3.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: