Management of type II odontoid fractures: experience from latin american spine centers

dc.contributor.authorFalavigna, Asdrubal
dc.contributor.authorRighesso, Orlando
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Pedro Guarise da
dc.contributor.authorSiri, Carlos Rocca
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Jefferson W.
dc.contributor.authorVeiga, José Carlos Esteves
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Gustavo Borges Laurindo de
dc.contributor.authorCarelli, Luis Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorYurac, Ratko
dc.contributor.authorChavez, Felix Adolfo Sanchez
dc.contributor.authorSfreddo, Ericson
dc.contributor.authorCecchini, Andre
dc.contributor.authorReis, Marcelo Martins do
dc.contributor.authorAvila, Jose Maria Jiménez
dc.contributor.authorRiew, K. Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-29T17:48:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: To analyze characteristics of type II odontoid fracture (TII-OF), including clinical and radiographic factors, that influence surgical planning in 8 Latin American centers. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed of 88 patients with TII-OF between 2004 and 2015 from 8 Latin American centers. Parameters studied included 1) demographic data and causes of TII-OF, 2) clinical and neurologic presentation, 3) characteristics of fracture (degree of odontoid displacement, displacement of odontoid relative to C2 body, anatomy of fracture line, distance between fragments, presence of comminution, contact area between odontoid and C2 body), 4) type of treatment, and 5) clinical and radiographic outcome. Bone fusion was assessed using computed tomography. Results: Mean patient age was 45.33 years 23.54; 78.4% of patients were male. Surgery was the primary treatment in 65 patients (73.8%), with an anterior approach in 64.6%. Surgery was usually preferred in patients with posterior or horizontal oblique fracture lines, local pain, and a smaller bone contact surface between the odontoid and the body of C2. A posterior approach was chosen when distance between the fractured bone fragments was >2 mm or after failed conservative or anterior odontoid screw treatment in a symptomatic patient. Conclusion: The treatment of choice for TII-OF in 8 Latin American trauma centers was surgery through an anterior approach using screw fixation. Posterior segmental C1-C2 fixation was indicated when distance between bone fragments was >2 mm and in symptomatic patients with nonunion.
dc.identifier.citationFALAVIGNA, Asdrubal; RIGHESSO, Orlando; SILVA, Pedro Guarise da; SIRI, Carlos Rocca; DANIEL, Jefferson W.; VEIGA, José Carlos Esteves; AZEVEDO, Gustavo Borges Laurindo de; CARELLI, Luis Eduardo; YURAC, Ratko; CHAVEZ, Felix Adolfo Sanchez; SFREDDO, Ericson; CECCHINI, Andre; REIS, Marcelo Martins do; AVILA, Jose Maria Jiménez; RIEW, K. Daniel. Management of type II odontoid fractures: experience from latin american spine centers. World Neurosurgery. United States. v.98. p673-681. 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.120
dc.identifier.issn1878-8750
dc.identifier.urihttps://ortobase.into.saude.gov.br/handle/123456789/649
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWorld Neurosurgery
dc.subjectConservative Treatment
dc.subjectGeriatrics
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures
dc.subjectType II Odontoid Fracture
dc.titleManagement of type II odontoid fractures: experience from latin american spine centers
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Falavigna, Asdrubal et al_2017.pdf
Size:
5.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: